ANALYSIS OF DOSAGE INSTRUCTIONS IN PACKAGE INSERTS FOR VETERINARY ANTIBACTERIAL MEDICATIONS AND IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL RISKS OF BACTERIAL RESISTANCE

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25110/arqvet.v29i1.2026-12684

Palavras-chave:

Animals, Antibiotics, Microbial resistance

Resumo

Veterinarians must follow several criteria before prescribing antibacterials, and one fundamental step is selecting the correct dosage from specialized literature. Occasionally, professionals use the dosage recommended in the package insert, but several report discrepancies between the package insert and the dosage recommended in the literature. Thus, the aim of this study was to compare the dosage presented in package inserts of antibacterials from the veterinary line with the dosage recommended in the updated scientific literature. Package inserts of all antibacterials produced by laboratories associated with the National Union of Animal Health Products Industry (SINDAN) indicated for systemic use in dogs, cats, horses, and cattle were analyzed. The percentage of observations with inserts showing dosage concordant with the consulted reference literature was 50.0% for dogs, 54.2% for cats, 3.8% for horses, and 23.6% for cattle. Of the total observations of veterinary line antibacterials produced by SINDAN-affiliated laboratories, 32% present a dose and interval concordant with the consulted literature, which may favor the expected therapeutic effect; 35% combine a dose below and/or an interval above the reference, which may favor bacterial resistance, a relevant issue for public health; 5% combine a dose above and/or an interval below the reference, which may cause iatrogenic intoxication; and 28% present other combinations, with an undefined effect. These possible consequences were not evaluated directly in this study. Most package inserts of antibacterials from the veterinary line produced by SINDAN-affiliated laboratories in Brazil show divergences in posology compared with the consulted reference literature. The most frequent type of divergence identified was a combination of dose below and/or interval above the reference, a pattern that could favor bacterial resistance if this association is confirmed by studies directly assessing this outcome.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Fransael Franklyn Araújo da Silva, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Ph.D. in Animal Science. Federal University of Paraná.

Camila Mariane Sawasa, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Veterinary Doctor. Federal University of Paraná.

Mariana Moratelli, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Master's Degree in Animal Science. Federal University of Paraná.

Luiza da Rosa Robusto, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Veterinary Doctor. Federal University of Paraná.

Ana Caroline Schwingel Wust, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Veterinary Doctor. Federal University of Paraná.

Júlia Roberta Cupchinski Rossetto, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Veterinary Doctor. Federal University of Paraná.

Erica Cristina Bueno do Prado Guirro, Universidade Federal do Paraná

Ph.D. in Veterinary Surgery from UNESP. Federal University of Paraná.

Referências

ANVISA. Plano Nacional para a Prevenção e o Controle da Resistência Microbiana nos Serviços de Saúde. Brasília, 2017. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/anvisa/pt-br/centraisdeconteudo/publicacoes/servicosdesaude/publicacoes/publicacoes/plano-nacional-para-a-prevencao-e-o-controle-da-resistencia-microbiana-nos-servicos-de-saude.pdf

ANVISA. RDC n. 20/2011 – Dispõe sobre o controle de medicamentos à base de substâncias classificadas como antimicrobianos. Brasília, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.anvisa.gov.br/sngpc/Documentos2012/RDC%2020%202011.pdf

AYUKEKBONG, J. A.; NTEMGWA, M.; ATABE, A. N. The threat of antimicrobial resistance in developing countries: causes and control strategies. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control, v. 6, n. 47, p. 1-8, 2017.

BENEDICTO, A. S. Iatrogenia y atención primaria de salud. FMC – Formación Médica Continuada en Atención Primaria, v. 26, n. 10, p. 529-531, 2019.

BOOTON, R. D. et al. One Health drivers of antibacterial resistance: quantifying the relative impacts of human, animal and environmental use and transmission. One Health, v. 12, p. 100220, 2021.

CNS. Resolução n. 287/1998 do Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Brasília, 1998. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br

CFMV. Código de Ética do Médico Veterinário. Brasília, 2016. Disponível em: http://portal.cfmv.gov.br

DECRETO nº 20.931. Regula e fiscaliza o exercício da medicina, da odontologia, da medicina veterinária e das profissões de farmacêutico, parteira e enfermeira no Brasil. Coletânea de Leis do Brasil, v. 1, n. 44, 1932.

ECDC. Factsheet for Experts – Antimicrobial Resistance. 2008. Disponível em: https://ecdc.europa.eu

GALLACCI, M.; CAVALCANTE, W. L. G. Farmacocinética: absorção, distribuição, biotransformação e excreção de fármacos. In: Farmacologia Veterinária. Barueri: Manole, 2012. p. 17-35.

GONZALES, E.; MELLO, H. H. C.; CAFÉ, M. B. Uso de antibióticos promotores de crescimento na alimentação e produção animal. Revista UFG, v. 13, n. 13, p. 48-53, 2012.

HOLLOWAY, K.; VAN DIJK, L. The World Medicines Situation 2011: Rational use of antibiotics. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2011.

LANDERS, T. F.; COHEN, B.; WITTUM, T. E.; LARSON, E. L. A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Reports, v. 127, n. 1, p. 4-22, 2012.

LOUREIRO, R. J.; ROQUE, F.; RODRIGUES, A. T.; HERDEIRO, M. T.; RAMALHEIRA, E. O uso de antibióticos e as resistências bacterianas: breves notas sobre a sua evolução. Revista Portuguesa de Saúde Pública, v. 34, n. 1, p. 77-84, 2016.

MARTÍNEZ, J. L. Natural antibiotic resistance and contamination by antibiotic resistance determinants: the two ages in the evolution of resistance to antimicrobials. Frontiers in Microbiology, v. 3, p. 1-3, 2012.

MS. Portaria n. 2.488/2011 do Ministério da Saúde. Brasília, 2011.

PRUSAKOV, P. et al. A global point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use in neonatal intensive care units: the NO-MAS-R study. EClinicalMedicine, v. 32, p. 100727, 2021.

RAMBLIÉRE, L.; GUILLEMOT, D.; DELAROCQUE-ASTAGNEAU, E.; HUYNH, B. T. Impact of mass and systematic antibiotic administration on antibiotic resistance in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2021.

RITTER, J. M.; FLOWER, R.; HENDERSON, G.; LOKE, Y. K.; MAC EWAN, D.; RANG, H. P. Princípios básicos da quimioterapia antimicrobiana. In: Rang ; Dale Farmacologia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2020. p. 649-660.

REGASSA, T. H.; KOELSCH, R. K.; DEAN, A. Antibiotic use in animal production: environmental concerns. University of Nebraska Extension, v. 196, p. 1-9, 2015.

REIS, A. G.; GUIMARÃES, P. M.; ATIQUE, T. S. C.; FURINI, A. A. C. Análise de potenciais interações medicamentosas em prescrições de um hospital veterinário. Revista de Ciências Farmacêuticas Básica e Aplicada, v. 33, n. 2, p. 291-298, 2012.

SALA, G. et al. Retrospective analysis of iatrogenic diseases in cattle requiring admission to a veterinary hospital. Veterinary Record Open, v. 6, n. 1, p. e000254, 2019.

SINITOX. Casos registrados de intoxicação humana e animal por agente tóxico. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2017.

SPINOSA, H. S.; TÁRRAGA, K. M. Considerações gerais sobre os antimicrobianos. In: Farmacologia aplicada à medicina veterinária. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan, 2017. p. 671-686.

STOKES, J. M. et al. A deep learning approach to antibiotic discovery. Cell, v. 180, p. 688-720, 2020.

UMBER, J. K.; BENDER, J. B. Pets and antimicrobial resistance. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 39, n. 2, p. 279-292, 2009.

VIANA, F. A. B. Guia terapêutico veterinário. 4. ed. Lagoa Santa: Editora CEM, 2019.

VIANA, F. A. B. Guia terapêutico veterinário. 5. ed. Lagoa Santa: Editora CEM, 2024.

WANG, F. et al. Antibiotic resistance in the soil ecosystem: a One Health perspective. Current Opinion in Environmental Science and Health, v. 20, p. 100230, 2021.

WHO. Global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.

WHO. Antimicrobial resistance. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2021.

YADAV, S.; KAPLEY, A. Antibiotic resistance: global health crisis and metagenomics. Biotechnology Reports, v. 29, p. e00604, 2021.

ZHANG, H. L. et al. Epidemiological cutoff values and acquired resistance mechanisms of three veterinary antibiotics against Escherichia coli from chicken respiratory tract infections. Poultry Science, v. 100, p. 1093-1097, 2021a.

ZHANG, R. M. et al. Distribution patterns of antibiotic resistance genes and their bacterial hosts in pig farm wastewater treatment systems. Science of the Total Environment, v. 758, p. 143654, 2021b.

Downloads

Publicado

23-09-2026

Como Citar

DA SILVA, Fransael Franklyn Araújo; SAWASA, Camila Mariane; MORATELLI, Mariana; ROBUSTO, Luiza da Rosa; WUST, Ana Caroline Schwingel; ROSSETTO, Júlia Roberta Cupchinski; GUIRRO, Erica Cristina Bueno do Prado. ANALYSIS OF DOSAGE INSTRUCTIONS IN PACKAGE INSERTS FOR VETERINARY ANTIBACTERIAL MEDICATIONS AND IDENTIFICATION OF POTENTIAL RISKS OF BACTERIAL RESISTANCE. Arquivos de Ciências Veterinárias e Zoologia da UNIPAR, [S. l.], v. 29, n. 1, p. 42–58, 2026. DOI: 10.25110/arqvet.v29i1.2026-12684. Disponível em: https://www.revistas.unipar.br/index.php/veterinaria/article/view/12684. Acesso em: 24 set. 2026.

Edição

Seção

Artigos

Artigos mais lidos pelo mesmo(s) autor(es)